MatterFirst vs Law App
MatterFirst and Law App,
compared honestly.
Australian-built and owner-operated, priced per file rather than per user, with general accounting included.
Last reviewed
MatterFirst vs Law App: what is the difference?
Law App is australian-built and owner-operated, priced per file rather than per user, with general accounting included. MatterFirst is an Australian-built alternative with AI document extraction, workflow automation and a client portal included on every plan, priced per workspace rather than per user, with data held in the AWS region your firm chooses.
| MatterFirst | Law App | |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Australia (NorthCape Technology, Melbourne) | Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Pricing | Per workspace from $199/month, users included | Not published. We do not list a competitor's pricing unless we can point at where it came from. |
| Data residency | Your chosen AWS region, including AI inference | Not published. Ask the vendor where inference runs, not only where files are stored. |
| Client portal | Included on every plan, no per-client charge | Not published |
| AI document extraction | Included, with a monthly AI balance on every paid plan | Not published |
| Contract term | No lock-in | Single-year contracts |
Law App details are drawn from the source linked at the foot of this page and were checked on 29 July 2026. Where we have not verified something, this page says so rather than estimating. On pricing: ours is published, per workspace rather than per seat, and is the list price with users included. A competitor's price appears here only where they publish it themselves, on the basis they publish it, and never as our estimate of what you would pay.
What Law App is good at
- Per-file pricing rather than per seat, which suits firms with few users and high file volume
- Includes full general accounting rather than only trust
- Single-year contracts
Things to weigh
- Smaller vendor with a smaller ecosystem
- Per-file pricing works against firms with many users and low file counts
Which one should you pick
Best fit, stated plainly.
We sell one of these, so weigh this accordingly. It is still the honest read, and if your situation is in the right-hand column we would rather you knew.
Choose MatterFirst when
- You have more users and lower file counts, where per-file pricing works against you
- You want AI document extraction and a visual workflow builder
Choose Law App when
- You have few users and high file volume, where per-file pricing works in your favour
- You want full general accounting rather than trust accounting alone
- You want single-year contracts
| MatterFirst | What to ask Law App | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust accounting | Built for Australian practice: per-matter ledgers, receipting, reconciliation, and a compliance review workflow covering New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia. Your external sign-off is recorded against the jurisdiction, and obtaining it remains your firm's responsibility. | Ask which Australian jurisdictions the trust module was built for, and whether it is local or adapted from another country's rules. |
| Trust ledger history on migration | The importer handles trust transactions, so your ledger history comes across with the rest of the migration. | Ask what format Law App exports trust history in. You need it for the seven-year retention period under s147 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law regardless of where you move. |
| PEXA | Connected to your firm's PEXA account so settlement dates and workspace details land against the matter. Set up with us rather than self-serve. | Not published. Ask whether PEXA is native, provided through a partner, or absent. |
| Xero | Invoices go out to Xero and payments come back, so the ledger and the matter agree without rekeying. | Not published. Ask whether the accounting integration writes back or only exports. |
| GST | Line amounts are GST-exclusive and GST is calculated on the taxable subtotal at your organisation's rate, which is standard Australian practice. | Not published. Ask to see a sample invoice with mixed taxable and non-taxable disbursements. |
| Data and AI location | The AWS region your firm chooses, Sydney by default. Document extraction and matter questions are processed in that same region. | Not published. Ask where inference runs, not only where files are stored. The two answers are frequently different regions. |
| Support | The people answering are in Victoria. We do not publish a support SLA, and we would rather say that than imply one. | Ask which timezone support runs in, and what the escalation path is outside those hours. |
The right-hand column is questions rather than answers on purpose. We have not verified how Law App handles Australian trust rules, PEXA or GST, and inventing an answer for them is the mistake that put false claims on this page before. Ask all three of your shortlisted vendors and compare what comes back.
MatterFirst is a legal practice management platform for Australian law firms, built by NorthCape Technology, covering matters, documents, trust accounting, billing and a client portal, with data hosted in the AWS region the firm chooses.
MatterFirst suits Australian firms up to about twenty seats wanting AI document extraction with onshore processing and per-workspace pricing. Law App suits small firms with high file throughput that want general accounting in the same system. MatterFirst is the weaker fit if you have few users and high file volume, where per-file pricing works in your favour.
Evaluation checklist
Take this to every vendor, including us
The questions worth asking any Australian practice management vendor, including the ones we answer badly. No form, no email required: read it here or download the markdown and put it in front of every platform on your shortlist.
Reviewed by Liam Killingback
Co-founder and Technical Director, NorthCape Technology
Builds the MatterFirst platform. Engineer rather than lawyer, which is why the pages he reviews cite sources instead of asserting legal positions.
Last reviewed
How we check this
- Every claim about another platform comes from that platform's own public documentation or pricing page, linked from the page it appears on.
- Where a vendor does not publish something, the page says 'not published' rather than estimating it. A guess that reads as a fact is the failure mode this rule exists to prevent.
- Every page carries the date its competitor facts were last checked, so you can see how fresh they are rather than assuming.
- We sell one of the products being compared. Every page says so, and every page states the cases where the competitor is the better choice.
- If you find something here that is wrong or out of date, tell us and we will correct it and re-date the page.
FAQ
Questions firms ask
How does MatterFirst pricing compare to Law App?
Can MatterFirst import my data from Law App?
What does MatterFirst do that Law App does not?
Where is my data stored?
How much does MatterFirst cost?
Can I get my data out if I leave?
Is there a free trial?
Who builds MatterFirst?
Is MatterFirst suitable for a firm of my size?
Weighing MatterFirst against Law App?
14 day guided trial with your own matters, and a migration conversation if you need one.
We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Attempting to reconnect